A Compassionate Approach to Coding
I've been in this game long enough to see countless programming languages, frameworks, and methodologies come and go. But there's one thing that hasn't changed: behind every line of code, there's a human story.
We often forget this. It's easy to get caught up in the latest tech trends, arguing about tabs vs. spaces, or obsessing over the perfect algorithm. But code isn't just about efficiency or elegance. It's about people making decisions under constraints.
The Story Behind the Code
Back in my early days of backend programming, we had this gnarly piece of code that handled user authentication. It was a mess—spaghetti logic, poorly named variables. My first instinct was to rewrite it from scratch. "Who wrote this garbage?" I remember thinking.
But then I dug deeper. Turns out, that code was written during a crucial period when we were racing against competitors to get a key feature out. The developer who wrote it was pulling all-nighters, fueled by nothing but pizza and determination. Was it perfect code? No. But it got the job done when we needed it most.
That experience taught me two crucial lessons about what I now call "compassionate coding":
1. Understand the past
Every piece of code you encounter is an artifact of its time. It carries with it the constraints, knowledge, and pressures of when it was written. Before you judge it, ask yourself:
- What was the context when this was written?
- What constraints was the developer under?
- What was the state of technology at the time?
You might be surprised by what you learn. That "outdated" library might have been cutting-edge when it was implemented. That "inefficient" algorithm might have been a clever workaround for hardware limitations of the time.
2. Avoid the blame game
It's human nature to look for someone to blame when things go wrong. A bug in production? Must be the dev who last touched that module. A performance issue? Clearly, it's the fault of whoever wrote that query.
But here's the thing: blame is worse than useless. It's actively harmful. It creates a culture of fear, where people are afraid to take risks or admit mistakes. And in any new endeavour, taking risks and learning from mistakes is how you win.
Instead of playing the blame game, try this:
- Focus on solutions, not scapegoats. When something goes wrong, make your first question "How do we fix this?" not "Whose fault is this?"
- Treat mistakes as learning opportunities. The most valuable lessons often come from our biggest screw-ups.
- Encourage open communication. Create an environment where people feel safe admitting errors and asking for help.
From Code to Culture
Compassionate coding isn't just about being nice. It's about creating a culture that fosters innovation, encourages learning, and ultimately produces better software. It's about recognizing that behind every commit, every pull request, every line of code, there's a human story.
So the next time you're tempted to curse at a piece of "bad" code or throw a coworker under the bus for a bug, pause. Take a breath. Try to understand the context. Focus on solutions, not blame.
You might just find that this compassionate approach not only makes you a better coder, but a better colleague and leader too. And in the long run, that's what really matters.